In response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in last year’s McCutcheon v. FEC, the FEC is now furiously trying to stifle speech in other ways.  Most notably, they are considering ways to regulate blogs by imposing burdensome regulations equivalent to spending caps in political speech.

To understand their scurrying, you first have to understand the McCutcheon ruling. Bobby R. Burchfield wrote:

The ruling in McCutcheon is very simple. Federal law contains both “base limits,” which were not at issue in McCutcheon, and “aggregate limits,” which were. A base limit is the amount an individual contributor may give to a single candidate per election or to a political committee, such as a political party, every year. An “aggregate limit” is the total amount an individual may legally give each two-year election cycle to all candidates, and a separate total the individual may give each election cycle all political committees.

The McCutcheon majority held that Congress has no legitimate purpose, once a contributor has given the maximum amount to nine candidates, for punishing the contributor for giving the same amount to a tenth candidate.

In other words, the decision was a good development, as the Supreme Court returned to First Amendment basics: the right to spend money is critical to political speech. Of course, the FEC isn’t happy.

According to Newsmax, the Democrats on the FEC commission are encouraging the government to “require even third-party internet-based groups to reveal donors, a move that would reverse a 2006 decision to keep the agency’s hands off the Internet.”

This, of course, is just the latest example of overbearing, out of control politicians and bureaucrats infringing on the constitutional rights of the American people. The federal government never misses an opportunity to flex its muscle, whether by blog regulation, runaway deficits, taxpayer abuse, or heavy-handed executive amnesty. The FEC’s move is even more chilling, because it attacks our dearly held First Amendment rights. George Washington said, If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” 

America as we know it won’t exist without the ability to freely express ourselves. We must be free to criticize those in power and those seeking power. Even as important, we must be free to support those with whom we agree. This is not a partisan position, but instead a universal truth demonstrated most beautifully by the millions of blogs, tweets, and articles on the Internet — the greatest communications equalizer in human history.

The ruling elite doesn’t like that. They long for the days when media was largely controlled by three networks, who largely parroted the same talking points.

Today, each of us has the capacity not just to consume media, but to be the media. Numerous famous bloggers today, just several years ago were hidden away in their own corner of the web, typing furiously to themselves. Yet through hard work, and commitment to their craft, they have created communications juggernauts, upon which millions rely for political information.

Can’t we agree that it’s a good development that we don’t have to rely on people like Brian Williams any more?

This article was first published at The Daily Caller.

About The Author

Mark was a co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, and served as the national coordinator. He left the organization to work more broadly on expanding the self-governance movement beyond the partisan divide. Mark appears regularly on television in outlets as diverse as MSNBC, ABC, NBC, Fox News, CNN, Bloomberg, Fox Business and the BBC. He’s highly sought after for the tea party perspective from print and electronic media outlets, from the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, L.A. Times, Washington Examiner, Politico and the The Hill. Mark blogs at, and his opinion editorials regularly run in many of the leading political newspapers both on and offline. Mark has a BA in English from San Diego State University and graduated with honors from University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law in 1988. He practiced real estate and business law for almost a decade. For the last eleven years of his legal career he specialized in Internet advertising law. When not fighting for the future of our nation, Mark is an avid horseman, and lives in rural northern California with his wife Patty and two children.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

three × one =