Free speech advocate Robert Shibley has a great piece in USA Today about the horrible violence that erupted in Charlottesville.  In his piece, he brings up a very important question: why was violence allowed to occur at all?  What were the police doing? Shibley writes:

State, local, and even college campus leadership appear to be telling police to stand by while some degree of unlawful violence takes place right before their eyes. Yet when that violence predictably spirals out of control, the authorities profess their inability to have done anything to stop it. Meanwhile, those inclined to violence are emboldened, secure in the knowledge that the publicity payoff is high and the odds of punishment low.

This must stop. Freedom of expression is what gives us the ability to hash out societal issues through argument instead of physical conflict, but it is only meaningful when people are reasonably confident that they will be physically safe while they speak and listen. When the authorities simply stand by and let political violence occur, even in the hope of the conflict somehow “de-escalating” itself, they send the message that both sides have a free hand to violently attack their opponents. This makes a mockery of the First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly.

I agree wholeheartedly. If the police are going to let the mobs run wild…then it’s only a matter of time until there are vigilantes on the other side.  While I hope the police will step in and step up in these situations, I’ll be surprised if they do. Why?  Police have been under siege for eight years…  and this has put them in a very difficult — if not impossible — situation.

If they act, they’ll be hated, vilified and sued.  If they don’t act, they’ll be hated, vilified and sued.

They’re paralyzed.  Just by doing their jobs, they could legally be in trouble….  And that doesn’t even account for the court of public opinion.  Even officers whose names have been cleared by courts still have their reputations ruined, their names smeared, and their lives trashed.  

Shibley is 100% correct in his piece.  The fact that the police should act to protect free speech is one issue.  Quite another is the fact that some of these activists have done nothing but undermine the authority of the police for years.  These anti-cop activists can’t scream all day long about how the police mistreat them and then act totally shocked when their inflammatory rhetoric finally has a consequence.

The chickens are coming home to roost.

Featured Image Credit: Flickr

About The Author

Mark was a co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, and served as the national coordinator. He left the organization to work more broadly on expanding the self-governance movement beyond the partisan divide. Mark appears regularly on television in outlets as diverse as MSNBC, ABC, NBC, Fox News, CNN, Bloomberg, Fox Business and the BBC. He’s highly sought after for the tea party perspective from print and electronic media outlets, from the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, L.A. Times, Washington Examiner, Politico and the The Hill. Mark blogs at, and his opinion editorials regularly run in many of the leading political newspapers both on and offline. Mark has a BA in English from San Diego State University and graduated with honors from University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law in 1988. He practiced real estate and business law for almost a decade. For the last eleven years of his legal career he specialized in Internet advertising law. When not fighting for the future of our nation, Mark is an avid horseman, and lives in rural northern California with his wife Patty and two children.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

twenty − 17 =