The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is a union that purports to help service employees — like janitors — to collectively  bargain with their employers.  Sounds good, right?  Well, the reality is far, far, from that ideal.

On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 ruling in Janus v. AFSCME  against the union.  George Will described the case:

In 1977, the Court upheld, 6–3, the constitutionality of compelling government employees who exercise their right not to join a union to pay “fair share” or “agency” fees. These, which the union determines, supposedly cover only the costs of collective bargaining from which nonmembers benefit. But the payments usually are much more than half of, and sometimes equal to, dues that members pay.

The majority opinion in 1977 admitted something that was too obvious to deny and so constitutionality problematic that a future challenge was inevitable. That majority said: “There can be no quarrel with the truism that, because public employee unions attempt to influence government policymaking, their activities…may be properly termed political.” And one justice, concurring with the majority, said “the ultimate objective of a union in the public sector, like that of a political party, is to influence public decision-making.” (Emphasis added.)

Actually, everything public-sector unions do is political. Therefore, the 1977 decision made compulsory political contributions constitutional. Which made the Court queasy.

If it makes the Court sick, think about how it made service employees.  Justice Elena Kagan explained why this 1977 decision needed to be corrected:

There is no sugarcoating today’s opinion. The majority overthrows a decision entrenched in this nation’s law — and in its economic life — for over 40 years. As a result, it prevents the American people, acting through their state and local officials, from making important choices about workplace governance. And it does so by weaponizing the First Amendment, in a way that unleashes judges, now and in the future, to intervene in economic and regulatory policy.

This huge news was met with hysteria from the left.  The SEUI, predictably, was apoplectic.  However, one secretary/treasurer of SEIU Local 503 Sub-local 099 in Oregon wrote that the Supreme Court decision was a “blessing in disguise.”  Avery T. Horton, Jr. wrote:

In reality, Janus prevailing is a blessing in disguise — a correction that was long overdue. Unions were born to work towards better and safer working conditions, and better wages and compensation for their members, not for union bosses and staff. In the 21st Century, unions have turned away from their core reasons for existence and instead have involved themselves — and members’ dues — in just about every political social justice cause under the sun. They also used member dues to pad their pockets with yearly salary and benefit increases but gave nothing back to dues-paying members.

In Oregon, SEIU Local 503 spends millions of dollars of members’ dues on political activities while members are left waiting as many as seven days to get their calls returned. That’s just one example of the inefficiencies and misplaced priorities.

Wow.  This man has a backbone of steel to criticize the SEIU.  And he wasn’t even close to being done.  He detailed some instances of union hypocrisy and ended his piece like this:

Those who want to play politics and fight for social justice are still free to do so, but only on their own dime and own time. The Janus decision will force changes upon SEIU Local 503 as revenue collection is projected to be drastically reduced. Had SEIU Local 503 stuck to their founding principles, that would never have happened because members would want to stay and not run for the hills at first opportunity.

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

This official’s courage shows that a new day is dawning in America. The unions are losing their grasp on the American worker’s wallet, and the nation is realizing just how irrelevant they actually are.

Image Credit: (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Angelita Lawrence) 

Hat Tip: OregonLive

About The Author

Mark Meckler

Mark was a co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, and served as the national coordinator. He left the organization to work more broadly on expanding the self-governance movement beyond the partisan divide. Mark appears regularly on television in outlets as diverse as MSNBC, ABC, NBC, Fox News, CNN, Bloomberg, Fox Business and the BBC. He’s highly sought after for the tea party perspective from print and electronic media outlets, from the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, L.A. Times, Washington Examiner, Politico and the The Hill. Mark blogs at MarkMeckler.com, and his opinion editorials regularly run in many of the leading political newspapers both on and offline. Mark has a BA in English from San Diego State University and graduated with honors from University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law in 1988. He practiced real estate and business law for almost a decade. For the last eleven years of his legal career he specialized in Internet advertising law. When not fighting for the future of our nation, Mark is an avid horseman, and lives in rural northern California with his wife Patty and two children.